Sebastian Langheinrich
The problem society has with The
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is whether we should let schools be
able to read the book or not, due to the vulgar language “nigger” and “injun”.
I think
that schools should be aloud to read The Adventures of Huckleberry
Finn even though there is harsh language because Huck shows us to
fight for what we want in life. I also believe that schools should keep the
crude words because they give the reader a certain feeling. If the words would
be switched than you wouldn’t get feeling of how harsh America was towards
slaves during the time of the book.
I believe
that this novel shows Huck fighting for what he wants which is to be free from
civilization and do his own thing. I believe that when Huck says, “But I reckon
I got to light out for the territory ahead of the rest, because Aunt Sally shes
going to adopt me and sivilize me, and I cant stand it.” (Twain Pg.260) he is
showing that he wants to get away from being “sivilized”. He obviously “cant stand
it” so he is doing what he wants and knows is best for himself and is going to
“light out for the territory ahead of the rest”.
I
understand that the words in Huckleberry Finn are inappropriate, but if you
would switch them, the student who would read the book wouldn’t have the same
feeling at the end of the story. They wouldn’t notice how rough times were when
the United States had slaves. When Huck says, “Tom Sawyer a nigger stealer!”
(Twain Pg.202) you noticed how powerful the word “nigger” is. But now if you
would switch “nigger” with the word “slave” it wouldn’t be the same. Because in
our worlds history slaves could’ve been anyone from a person captured in war to
someone just taken advantage of. Also when Huck says “nigger stealer” he is
acting as if Jim is just an object or owned. But if it were “slave stealer” the
words wouldn’t pop out to you as much because they didn’t symbolize a terrible
time in our nations history, there have been slaves of any color all over our
world. The word slave isn’t as insulting as “nigger”.
For me
after reading the novel I would disagree with Paul Butler who posted an Op-Ed
on The New York Times because I didn’t see our society in colors like Paul
Butler did. I still saw all of my friends the same and as equals except for
their goofy personalities. When Paul Butler says, “If other teachers think keeping those epithets in is worth the pain they
will cause students of color, I understand that too.” (Butler NY Times Op-Ed)
to me it seems like he is saying that when students read this book they will
automatically see everything in “color”, they will see their fellow students as
black, white, yellow, or whatever other stereotypical colors there are. I also
don’t believe that causing people to see their society in “color” is what Twain
meant to happen. I feel as if Twain meant for his readers to see each other as
equals despite the difference in skin color. I believe this because (on page 55
online) Huck explains that he saw “white” inside of Jim because of the good
action and thought that Jim did/had for Tom. I understand that seeing him as
“white” inside simply could be argued as seeing Jim once again as a color, but
I feel that there is more meaning to it such as Huck only knowing white and
black people so he says that Jim is also like a white person with a heart and
mind (inside).
I think that this book should be
read in schools because the only reason as to why people see the society in
color after the novel is because all they think about is how their was racism
or how the story didn’t stop racism or slavery. Just reading the book and
getting into deep thought will not cause this unless you’re trying to find some
new whole meaning to this book. I still believe that the words shouldn’t be
switched. Even Morrison says, “…what it cannot be dismissed” (Morrison) stating
that you “cannot” “dismiss” the words to others that will have less effect. It
will change the whole thought on the book and our nations history. So I believe
that schools (mainly High School) should read Huckleberry Finn because it is a
great novel that requires a lot of thinking and it also secretly told me to
fight for what I want and I will achieve it.
Work Cited
Paul
Butler, “Why Read That Book?” The New York Times (2011)
Twain, Mark. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
Edited by Shelley Fisher Fiskin; introduction by Toni Morrison,
afterword by Victor Doyno. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Twain, Mark. The
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall,
2000. Print.
I agree with the book being approved to be read in school. However i do not agree with Your statement "Huck shows us to fight for what we want in life." I do not think through out the novel that Huck was actually being an example to stand up and "fight" for what we believe in. Instead i think that he was just a young boy trying to escape societies outlooks not knowing how or thinking about the consequences. What the reader could learn from this novel is the change of language and beliefs from then to now. The reader could also learn use the similarities of bucks teenage fews and ours.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you partially. The power of the word nigger is just so much more tremendous than using slave. There's just a lot more attention towards the word nigger and there are just to many outside connections with the word slave. But I also agree with Kali about her comment about your statement. Huck never really did stand up for anything. He was just looking for a way out of his old life with his drunk father and uptight Aunt Sally.
ReplyDeleteI really liked your color observation, I did not notice that there were references to colors in that respect. This novel forces us to truly see the good the bad and the ugly. Not only does it force us to see it but it pushes our minds to think about it- therefore altering our thought process. Literature has the power to change lives for the better or for the worse. In my opinion, it is only 'the greats' can make us change our perception and our thought process. However, the readers of this novel cannot come to this conversion on their own unless they truly take the time to understand the symbolism in every line of the novel. This is not a novel to be read for leisure. As long as the novel is understood and taught respectfully the book can be a great tool but it also hold the power to be a destructive aspect to the classroom as well.
ReplyDeletei agree with you sebastian. I really like how you talked about the emphasis that the word "nigger" has in the book and i like what you said about changing it to slave, and how that wouldn't really work. i also think that the words slave and nigger are totally different. where a slave could be anyone- black, white, hispanic, asian, it doesn't matter because any race can be a slave. while the word "nigger" really only describes one race and that is blacks. if they put the word slave instead of nigger, then i feel that it any statement they said which they replaced the n word with slave, that statement would be false because of the real definition of slave.
ReplyDelete